<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A rare day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kayakacrossthewater.co.uk/2009/11/13/portavadie-tarbert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kayakacrossthewater.co.uk/2009/11/13/portavadie-tarbert/</link>
	<description>Observations on sea kayaking (among some other things) from Argyll, Scotland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:10:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pamf</title>
		<link>http://www.kayakacrossthewater.co.uk/2009/11/13/portavadie-tarbert/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>pamf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kayakacrossthewater.co.uk/?p=1103#comment-836</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your insight, Douglas. You&#039;re correct - I appear to be having about as much success with the waterproof camera as with a disposable model. I&#039;ve taken over the role of Paddling Photographer-in-Chief in the absence of Alan, who is still sidelined due to injury (he can sympathise with you!). Quality of images has taken a marked downturn as a result, generally speaking (I am more of a &quot;snapper&quot; than a photographer). But Alan agrees that he is not happy with the camera and the eternal water droplet/misting/de-focusing/smudging problems. We shall continue to work on a solution! Meanwhile, I am glad that your blog is out there to truly depict Scottish paddling at its best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your insight, Douglas. You&#8217;re correct &#8211; I appear to be having about as much success with the waterproof camera as with a disposable model. I&#8217;ve taken over the role of Paddling Photographer-in-Chief in the absence of Alan, who is still sidelined due to injury (he can sympathise with you!). Quality of images has taken a marked downturn as a result, generally speaking (I am more of a &#8220;snapper&#8221; than a photographer). But Alan agrees that he is not happy with the camera and the eternal water droplet/misting/de-focusing/smudging problems. We shall continue to work on a solution! Meanwhile, I am glad that your blog is out there to truly depict Scottish paddling at its best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://www.kayakacrossthewater.co.uk/2009/11/13/portavadie-tarbert/comment-page-1/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kayakacrossthewater.co.uk/?p=1103#comment-834</guid>
		<description>Hello Pam, your problem is you have a waterproof camera. 

These fiendish contraptions have ruined more sea kayaking photos than anything else. If you spent £200 on one you, could have bought a really superb non waterproof camera and a dry bag. You might even have an old, non waterproof, digital camera lying about. Use it instead! I can almost guarantee it will take better photos than a waterproof camera. I have a 3mp Sony non waterproof camera from 2001 which takes far better photos than my brother&#039;s brand new 2009 WS80 10mp waterproof camera.

Once you get interested in photography, as you clearly are, you just won&#039;t be able to accept the compromises of waterproof cameras.

:o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Pam, your problem is you have a waterproof camera. </p>
<p>These fiendish contraptions have ruined more sea kayaking photos than anything else. If you spent £200 on one you, could have bought a really superb non waterproof camera and a dry bag. You might even have an old, non waterproof, digital camera lying about. Use it instead! I can almost guarantee it will take better photos than a waterproof camera. I have a 3mp Sony non waterproof camera from 2001 which takes far better photos than my brother&#8217;s brand new 2009 WS80 10mp waterproof camera.</p>
<p>Once you get interested in photography, as you clearly are, you just won&#8217;t be able to accept the compromises of waterproof cameras.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.kayakacrossthewater.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
